CyberzSOC

Applicability
← Back to CVE-2025-30066

CVE-2025-30066

In CISA KEV tj-actions

Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.

Does it affect your version?

A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.

What each source says

OSV.dev (incl. GHSA)
precedence 80 · revised 2026-08-12
2 affected 2 fixed
CVE List v5 (CNA container)
precedence 60 · revised 2026-02-26
1 affected

Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.

Statements (5)

Product Status Versions Remediation Source
https://github.com/tj-actions/changed-files affected >= eef94236f6b9dec768f89dc72b9e0b64e13bb36e, < ed68ef82c095e0d48ec87eccea555d944a631a4c vendor fix → ed68ef82c095e0d48ec87eccea555d944a631a4c osv
tj-actions/changed-files affected < 46.0.1 vendor fix → 46.0.1 osv GHSA-mrrh-fwg8-r2c3
https://github.com/tj-actions/changed-files fixed ed68ef82c095e0d48ec87eccea555d944a631a4c vendor fix → ed68ef82c095e0d48ec87eccea555d944a631a4c osv
tj-actions/changed-files fixed 46.0.1 vendor fix → 46.0.1 osv GHSA-mrrh-fwg8-r2c3
tj-actions/changed-files tj-actions · changed-files affected >= 1, < 46 none available cve_cna

A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.