Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.
A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.
Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.
| Product | Status | Versions | Remediation | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens/Parasolid V35.0 Siemens · Parasolid V35.0 | affected | < V35.0.263 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Siemens/Parasolid V35.1 Siemens · Parasolid V35.1 | affected | < V35.1.252 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Siemens/Parasolid V36.0 Siemens · Parasolid V36.0 | affected | < V36.0.198 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Siemens/Solid Edge SE2023 Siemens · Solid Edge SE2023 | affected | < V223.0 Update 11 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Siemens/Solid Edge SE2024 Siemens · Solid Edge SE2024 | affected | < V224.0 Update 3 | none available | cve_cna |
A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.