CyberzSOC

Applicability
← Back to CVE-2024-3272

CVE-2024-3272

In CISA KEV D-Link

Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.

Does it affect your version?

A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.

What each source says

CVE List v5 (CNA container)
precedence 60 · revised 2025-10-21
4 affected
CVE List v5 (ADP/Vulnrichment)
precedence 55 · revised 2025-10-21
4 affected

Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.

Statements (8)

Product Status Versions Remediation Source
D-Link/DNS-320L D-Link · DNS-320L affected 20240403 none available cve_cna
D-Link/DNS-325 D-Link · DNS-325 affected 20240403 none available cve_cna
D-Link/DNS-327L D-Link · DNS-327L affected 20240403 none available cve_cna
D-Link/DNS-340L D-Link · DNS-340L affected 20240403 none available cve_cna
dlink/dns-320l_firmware dlink · dns-320l_firmware affected 20240403 none available cve_adp
dlink/dns-325_firmware dlink · dns-325_firmware affected 20240403 none available cve_adp
dlink/dns-327l_firmware dlink · dns-327l_firmware affected 20240403 none available cve_adp
dlink/dns-340l_firmware dlink · dns-340l_firmware affected 20240403 none available cve_adp

A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.