CyberzSOC

Applicability
← Back to CVE-2025-3248

CVE-2025-3248

In CISA KEV Langflow

Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.

Does it affect your version?

A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.

What each source says

OSV.dev (incl. GHSA)
precedence 80 · revised 2026-08-12
5 affected 5 fixed
CVE List v5 (CNA container)
precedence 60 · revised 2026-07-14
1 affected

Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.

Statements (7)

Product Status Versions Remediation Source
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow affected < 6c2ff92ccf083f038d9a97a749b4e0f30a60247a vendor fix → 6c2ff92ccf083f038d9a97a749b4e0f30a60247a osv
langflow affected < 1.3.0 vendor fix → 1.3.0 osv GHSA-rvqx-wpfh-mfx7
langflow-base affected < 0.3.0 vendor fix → 0.3.0 osv PYSEC-2026-380
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow fixed 6c2ff92ccf083f038d9a97a749b4e0f30a60247a vendor fix → 6c2ff92ccf083f038d9a97a749b4e0f30a60247a osv
langflow fixed 1.3.0 vendor fix → 1.3.0 osv GHSA-rvqx-wpfh-mfx7
langflow-base fixed 0.3.0 vendor fix → 0.3.0 osv PYSEC-2026-380
langflow-ai/langflow langflow-ai · langflow affected < 1.3.0 none available cve_cna

A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.