Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.
A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.
Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.
| Product | Status | Versions | Remediation | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft/Windows 11 Version 24H2 Microsoft · Windows 11 Version 24H2 | affected | >= 10.0.26100.0, < 10.0.26100.7462 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Microsoft/Windows 11 Version 25H2 Microsoft · Windows 11 Version 25H2 | affected | >= 10.0.26200.0, < 10.0.26200.7462 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Microsoft/Windows Server 2025 Microsoft · Windows Server 2025 | affected | >= 10.0.26100.0, < 10.0.26100.7462 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Microsoft/Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) Microsoft · Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) | affected | >= 10.0.26100.0, < 10.0.26100.7462 | none available | cve_cna |
A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.