CyberzSOC

Applicability
← Back to CVE-2025-8110

CVE-2025-8110

In CISA KEV Gogs

Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.

Does it affect your version?

A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.

What each source says

OSV.dev (incl. GHSA)
precedence 80 · revised 2026-08-07
4 affected 1 fixed
CVE List v5 (CNA container)
precedence 60 · revised 2026-02-26
1 affected

Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.

Statements (6)

Product Status Versions Remediation Source
gogs.io/gogs affected <= 0.13.3 none available osv GHSA-mq8m-42gh-wq7r
gogs.io/gogs affected no version stated vendor label: all versions none available osv GO-2025-4225
https://github.com/gogs/gogs affected <= 5084b4a9b77a506f5e287e82e945e1c6882b827a none available osv
https://github.com/gogs/gogs affected < 553707f3fd5f68f47f531cfcff56aa3ec294c6f6 vendor fix → 553707f3fd5f68f47f531cfcff56aa3ec294c6f6 osv
https://github.com/gogs/gogs fixed 553707f3fd5f68f47f531cfcff56aa3ec294c6f6 vendor fix → 553707f3fd5f68f47f531cfcff56aa3ec294c6f6 osv
Gogs/Gogs/Gogs Gogs · Gogs affected <= 0.13.3 none available cve_cna

A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.