Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.
A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.
Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.
| Product | Status | Versions | Remediation | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honeywell/25M IPC Honeywell · 25M IPC | affected | WDR_2MP_32M_PTZ_v2.0 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Honeywell/I-HIB2PI-UL 2MP IP Honeywell · I-HIB2PI-UL 2MP IP | affected | 6.1.22.1216 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Honeywell/PTZ WDR 2MP 32M Honeywell · PTZ WDR 2MP 32M | affected | WDR_2MP_32M_PTZ_v2.0 | none available | cve_cna | |
| Honeywell/SMB NDAA MVO-3 Honeywell · SMB NDAA MVO-3 | affected | WDR_2MP_32M_PTZ_v2.0 | none available | cve_cna |
A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.