Every applicability statement published about this vulnerability, kept as each source wrote it rather than merged into one verdict. Where sources disagree, both positions are shown.
A statement that names no version covers the whole product, which is not the same as your version falling inside a range. Orderings marked best effort come from schemes with no published comparison algorithm; exact ones follow a published specification.
Precedence decides which claim wins when two sources describe the same product over the same version range. It is a property of the source, not of the claim, and changing it re-ranks the data without re-reading a single document.
| Product | Status | Versions | Remediation | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @genql/cli | affected | < 6.3.4 | vendor fix → 6.3.4 | osv GHSA-w757-xvvv-vgfw | |
| https://github.com/remorses/genql | affected | < 5276a6968fd043cd2dab8270deadf3dc8ec9ec6b | vendor fix → 5276a6968fd043cd2dab8270deadf3dc8ec9ec6b | osv | |
| @genql/cli | fixed | 6.3.4 | vendor fix → 6.3.4 | osv GHSA-w757-xvvv-vgfw | |
| https://github.com/remorses/genql | fixed | 5276a6968fd043cd2dab8270deadf3dc8ec9ec6b | vendor fix → 5276a6968fd043cd2dab8270deadf3dc8ec9ec6b | osv | |
| remorses/genql remorses · genql | affected | < 6.3.4 | none available | cve_cna | |
| remorses/genql remorses · genql | not affected | 6.3.4 | not applicable | cve_cna |
A claim with no version range is shown as written rather than expanded: a government catalog naming only a vendor and product is a real statement at zero granularity, and inventing bounds for it would put precision in the record that the source never offered.